DEVAMMA vs THAHASILDAR — 95/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS310002762026

Filing Number

95/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

95/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVAMMA

    Adv. RAJASHEKARA MURTHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary of Case 95/2026 The court allowed Devamma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of Akkamma W/o Siddanayaka (who died on 01.01.1969) and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioner's claims substantiated by her unchallenged affidavit, genealogical tree, and a non-availability certificate, with no opposing evidence from the respondent despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 02-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 02-May-2026

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Paper Publication

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 95/2026 The court allowed Devamma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of Akkamma W/o Siddanayaka (who died on 01.01.1969) and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioner's claims substantiated by her unchallenged affidavit, genealogical tree, and a non-availability certificate, with no opposing evidence from the respondent despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case