DHARGYAL GYATSO vs THAHASILDAR — 65/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13 (3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS310001412026

Filing Number

65/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

447-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13 (3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARGYAL GYATSO

    Adv. B.KIRAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case 65/2026 Summary: The National Lok-Adalath allowed petitioner Dhargyal Gyatso's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, based on a joint memo agreed upon by both parties. The Tahsildar (respondent) was directed to register the petitioner's date of birth as 10.10.1975 at Gurupura, Hunsr Taluk, Mysuru District, and issue a birth certificate if no prior entry exists, upon collection of prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Refer to La/Mediation

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 65/2026 Summary: The National Lok-Adalath allowed petitioner Dhargyal Gyatso's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, based on a joint memo agreed upon by both parties. The Tahsildar (respondent) was directed to register the petitioner's date of birth as 10.10.1975 at Gurupura, Hunsr Taluk, Mysuru District, and issue a birth certificate if no prior entry exists, upon collection of prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case