Marikanthamma vs M.D Mahadevu — 21/2019
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section cpc. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 25th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS310000862019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
21/2019
Filing Date
17-01-2019
Registration No
21/2019
Registration Date
18-01-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
447-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Marikanthamma
Adv. Santhosh Kumar
Mahadevanayaka
Respondent(s)
M.D Mahadevu
Narayananayaka
Lakshmanayaka
Hearing History
Judge: 447-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Disposed
JUDGEMENTS
FOR REPLY
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 06-03-2026 | FOR REPLY | |
| 26-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, declaring them absolute owners and in possession of the disputed property based on a registered sale deed from 1969, and permanently restrained the defendants from interfering with their peaceful possession. The court found that the plaintiffs had established their ownership through the sale deed and continuous possession, while the defendants' claims based on ancestral property rights were not substantiated, applying the principle "first in time is first in right." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, declaring them absolute owners and in possession of the disputed property based on a registered sale deed from 1969, and permanently restrained the defendants from interfering with their peaceful possession. The court found that the plaintiffs had established their ownership through the sale deed and continuous possession, while the defendants' claims based on ancestral property rights were not substantiated, applying the principle "first in time is first in right." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts