MANCHAMMA vs THAHASILDAR — 16/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS310000332026
Filing Number
16/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
16/2026
Registration Date
07-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANCHAMMA
Adv. RAVI. P
-
2.DEVAMMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAHASILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Hunsur allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of Savalanayaka (who died on 06.04.1990) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners upon payment of late fees. The court found that the petitioners, being illiterate, had no knowledge of death registration requirements, and their unchallenged testimony supported by a non-availability certificate sufficiently established the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
04-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Apr-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
20-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2026
Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Hunsur allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of Savalanayaka (who died on 06.04.1990) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners upon payment of late fees. The court found that the petitioners, being illiterate, had no knowledge of death registration requirements, and their unchallenged testimony supported by a non-availability certificate sufficiently established the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts