MANCHAMMA vs THAHASILDAR — 15/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS310000322026

Filing Number

15/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANCHAMMA

    Adv. RAVI. P

  2. 2.DEVAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed the petition and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of Lakshmamma (who died on 20.03.1994) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found that the petitioners, being illiterate, had no knowledge of registration requirements at the time, and their claim was supported by unchallenged evidence including a non-availability certificate and genealogical documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of Lakshmamma (who died on 20.03.1994) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found that the petitioners, being illiterate, had no knowledge of registration requirements at the time, and their claim was supported by unchallenged evidence including a non-availability certificate and genealogical documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case