SWAMY.C. vs SOMANAYAKA @ SOMU — 4/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200Cr.PC,r/w/s138,NIAct. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS310000292024
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2024
Filing Date
06-01-2024
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
06-01-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
1096-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SWAMY.C.
Adv. V.VENKATESH
Respondent(s)
SOMANAYAKA @ SOMU
Hearing History
Judge: 1096-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 16-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The document is in Kannada and contains detailed testimony and findings, though some portions appear degraded. Based on the readable sections: Summary: The court examined witness testimony in Criminal Case 4/2024 dated 07.03.2026. The case involves a cheque transaction where the plaintiff allegedly loaned 5 lakh rupees to the defendant on 26.07.2023, with a blank cheque provided for repayment security. The court found that the defendant received the money but fraudulently used the blank cheque, that the plaintiff provided false testimony, and that there was no prior acquaintance between the parties. The petition was dismissed, with the court determining the witness testimony was unreliable and the claims unsupported by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The document is in Kannada and contains detailed testimony and findings, though some portions appear degraded. Based on the readable sections: Summary: The court examined witness testimony in Criminal Case 4/2024 dated 07.03.2026. The case involves a cheque transaction where the plaintiff allegedly loaned 5 lakh rupees to the defendant on 26.07.2023, with a blank cheque provided for repayment security. The court found that the defendant received the money but fraudulently used the blank cheque, that the plaintiff provided false testimony, and that there was no prior acquaintance between the parties. The petition was dismissed, with the court determining the witness testimony was unreliable and the claims unsupported by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts