SOMASHEKARA vs NARYANAGOWDA — 16/2023

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section CPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 05-Aug-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS310000282023

Filing Number

16/2023

Filing Date

02-Jan-2023

Registration No

16/2023

Registration Date

05-Jan-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

447-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOMASHEKARA

    Adv. B.A.SURESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARYANAGOWDA

  2. 2.CHANNEGOWDA

  3. 3.GOWRAMMA

  4. 4.SARASWATHI

Case History

  1. 05-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jul-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S 16/2023 In this succession dispute, petitioner Somashekara challenged a will allegedly created in 2013 by deceased Kadregowda favoring respondents Naryanagowda, Channegowda, and Gowramma. Somashekara claimed the will was fraudulent, created through false statements by illiterate respondents, and that she possessed a superior claim to the estate based on possession and use. The court found insufficient evidence supporting Somashekara's allegations of fraud, noted the respondents' illiteracy and advanced age of Kadregowda (85-90 years), and determined that Somashekara failed to prove her claim to the property. The petition was dismissed, with the court finding the respondents' defense credible and the will's validity upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Objection

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  10. 26-Sep-2025

    Objection

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  11. 07-Aug-2025

    Objection

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  12. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  13. 19-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  14. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  15. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  16. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  17. 20-Jul-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 20-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  19. 20-Jun-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  21. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  22. 25-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  23. 23-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  24. 19-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  25. 10-Jan-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  26. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  27. 01-Dec-2023

    IssueView PDF

  28. 01-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  29. 09-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  30. 07-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  31. 03-Aug-2023

    Issues

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  32. 01-Jul-2023

    W/S

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  33. 31-May-2023

    W/S

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  34. 30-Mar-2023

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  35. 23-Feb-2023

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  36. 09-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 02-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S 16/2023 In this succession dispute, petitioner Somashekara challenged a will allegedly created in 2013 by deceased Kadregowda favoring respondents Naryanagowda, Channegowda, and Gowramma. Somashekara claimed the will was fraudulent, created through false statements by illiterate respondents, and that she possessed a superior claim to the estate based on possession and use. The court found insufficient evidence supporting Somashekara's allegations of fraud, noted the respondents' illiteracy and advanced age of Kadregowda (85-90 years), and determined that Somashekara failed to prove her claim to the property. The petition was dismissed, with the court finding the respondents' defense credible and the will's validity upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case