PHUSPA vs THAHASILDAR — 10/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13(3) RBD. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS310000272026

Filing Number

10/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

10/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

1096-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S 13(3) RBD

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PHUSPA

    Adv. S KEMPARAJU

  2. 2.CHANDRAGIRI B.R.

  3. 3.THAYAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register the death of Maridasanayaka (who died on 08.07.1985) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioners' claim credible based on unchallenged affidavit evidence, genealogical documents, and a non-availability certificate, with no opposition from the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register the death of Maridasanayaka (who died on 08.07.1985) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioners' claim credible based on unchallenged affidavit evidence, genealogical documents, and a non-availability certificate, with no opposition from the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case