MUTTHURAJU K.V vs THAHASILDAR — 1/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS310000072026

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

447-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUTTHURAJU K.V

    Adv. C.K.MANJUNATHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: Mutthuraju K.V. v. Thahasildar (Crl. Misc. 1/2026) The National Lok-Adalath allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, based on a joint memo filed by both parties. The court directed the Thahasildar to register the petitioner's birth date as 13.09.1995 at Karnakuppe Village, Hunsur Taluk, Mysuru District, upon collection of prescribed fees, provided no prior entry exists in the office records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Refer to La/Mediation

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 03-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mutthuraju K.V. v. Thahasildar (Crl. Misc. 1/2026) The National Lok-Adalath allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, based on a joint memo filed by both parties. The court directed the Thahasildar to register the petitioner's birth date as 13.09.1995 at Karnakuppe Village, Hunsur Taluk, Mysuru District, upon collection of prescribed fees, provided no prior entry exists in the office records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case