PUTTAMMA vs PUTTAMMA DEAD BY LRS RAMACHANDRA — 6/2022

Case under Others Section U/Order.7,Rule,9,of,CPC. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KAMS300042102022

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6/2022

Filing Date

24-08-2022

Registration No

6/2022

Registration Date

26-08-2022

Court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

446-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR

Acts & Sections

OTHERS Section U/Order.7,Rule,9,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

PUTTAMMA

Adv. S.SHIVANNE GOWDA

Respondent(s)

PUTTAMMA DEAD BY LRS RAMACHANDRA

SUSHEELA

LALITHAMMA

SHIVARAJU

Hearing History

Judge: 446-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR

28-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

13-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

20-01-2026

Cross Examination

05-01-2026

Objection on IA

Interim Orders

09-06-2023
Deposition
03-02-2024
Deposition
29-05-2024
Deposition
24-07-2024
Deposition
16-01-2025
Deposition
15-11-2025
Deposition
09-12-2025
Deposition
13-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: Mis 6/2022 Court: Principal Senior Civil Court and JMFC, Hunsur Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court noted that during the COVID-19 lockdown period (March 2020 to July 2021), the plaintiff and defendant failed to appear before the court in the underlying civil suit (OS 82/2018). Due to the lockdown restrictions preventing public movement and the plaintiff's advanced age (70-75 years), the court found justifiable reasons for non-appearance. The underlying suit was consequently withdrawn, and the petitioner has not provided sufficient grounds for reconsideration of the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mis 6/2022 Court: Principal Senior Civil Court and JMFC, Hunsur Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court noted that during the COVID-19 lockdown period (March 2020 to July 2021), the plaintiff and defendant failed to appear before the court in the underlying civil suit (OS 82/2018). Due to the lockdown restrictions preventing public movement and the plaintiff's advanced age (70-75 years), the court found justifiable reasons for non-appearance. The underlying suit was consequently withdrawn, and the petitioner has not provided sufficient grounds for reconsideration of the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case