JYOTHI vs LAKSHMI — 406/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS300024932025
Filing Number
414/2025
Filing Date
25-Oct-2025
Registration No
406/2025
Registration Date
17-Nov-2025
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
446-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JYOTHI
Adv. D.USHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.LAKSHMI
-
2.B M SURENDRA HEGDE
-
3.SAHANA
-
4.KUM. VAISHNAVI HEGGADE MINOR R/BY NATURAL GUARDIAN HER MOTHER
-
5.MAS. BHUVAN HEGGADE MINOR R/BY NATURAL GUARDIAN HIS MOTHER
-
6.B M MAHENDRA HEGDE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Lok Adalat accepted a joint compromise petition filed by the plaintiff and defendants (including D3 acting as natural guardian for minor children D4 and D5) under Section 20 of the Karnataka Legal Services Authorities Act. The court found the compromise was voluntary and without coercion, verified parties' identities through Aadhar cards, and disposed of the case by issuing a decree in terms of the compromise with court fee refund to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
13-Mar-2026
Settlement
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Mar-2026
Settlement
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
10-Feb-2026
Settlement
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
23-Jan-2026
Steps
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
08-Dec-2025
Summons
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
21-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 406/2025
The Lok Adalat accepted a joint compromise petition filed by the plaintiff and defendants (including D3 acting as natural guardian for minor children D4 and D5) under Section 20 of the Karnataka Legal Services Authorities Act. The court found the compromise was voluntary and without coercion, verified parties' identities through Aadhar cards, and disposed of the case by issuing a decree in terms of the compromise with court fee refund to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts