KARNATAKA GRAMEENA BANK R/BY THE BRANCH MANAGER vs PARTHACHARI — 401/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS300024782025

Filing Number

408/2025

Filing Date

25-Oct-2025

Registration No

401/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

921-I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,CPC

Petitioner(s)

1.KARNATAKA GRAMEENA BANK R/BY THE BRANCH MANAGER

Adv. B.B. LOKESHA

Respondent(s)

1.PARTHACHARI
2.PRASANNA P
3.LOKESHA
4.NAGEGOWDA
5.ADARSHA N

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrdersView PDF

Case Summary: OS 401/2025 Karnataka Grameena Bank's suit against Parthachari, Prasanna P, and Lokesha was disposed as settled. The defendants resolved their outstanding claim with the bank through the OTS (One-Time Settlement) scheme, evidenced by a signed settlement memo. The court accepted the settlement and permitted refund of court fees to the plaintiff bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
23-Feb-2026

Evidence

I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
27-Jan-2026

Written Statement

I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
13-Dec-2025

Call On

I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
05-Dec-2025

Settlement

I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
19-Nov-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
25-Oct-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 401/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 401/2025 Karnataka Grameena Bank's suit against Parthachari, Prasanna P, and Lokesha was disposed as settled. The defendants resolved their outstanding claim with the bank through the OTS (One-Time Settlement) scheme, evidenced by a signed settlement memo. The court accepted the settlement and permitted refund of court fees to the plaintiff bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.