VISHALA vs APARA EDUCATION CHARITABLE TRUST R/BY ITS TRUSTEES — 397/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,CPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS300024612025

HEARING

Next Hearing

22nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

404/2025

Filing Date

04-11-2025

Registration No

397/2025

Registration Date

13-11-2025

Court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

921-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/O,7,RULE,1,CPC

Petitioner(s)

VISHALA

Adv. O SHAMA BHAT

Respondent(s)

APARA EDUCATION CHARITABLE TRUST R/BY ITS TRUSTEES

Hearing History

Judge: 921-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR

04-04-2026

HEARING

17-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

12-02-2026

ORDERS

Interim Orders

27-02-2026
Orders

Summary: The defendant's Interlocutory Application (IA-IV) seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a), (b), and (c) CPC has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff's plaint discloses a valid cause of action with sufficient averments regarding the party relationship, transaction details, termination of lease/tenancy, and the defendant's alleged failure to vacate. The court held that rival documentary evidence and disputes over property valuation constitute triable issues requiring full trial and cannot be adjudicated at the threshold stage. The defendant is liable to pay Rs. 500 in costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The defendant's Interlocutory Application (IA-IV) seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a), (b), and (c) CPC has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff's plaint discloses a valid cause of action with sufficient averments regarding the party relationship, transaction details, termination of lease/tenancy, and the defendant's alleged failure to vacate. The court held that rival documentary evidence and disputes over property valuation constitute triable issues requiring full trial and cannot be adjudicated at the threshold stage. The defendant is liable to pay Rs. 500 in costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case