KARNATAKA GRAMIN BANK vs LEELAVATHI — 22/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,34,Rule,5,R/W,Sec,151. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr

CNR: KAMS300022372025

Filing Number

22/2025

Filing Date

08-Oct-2025

Registration No

22/2025

Registration Date

14-Oct-2025

Court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

446-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,34,Rule,5,R/W,Sec,151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARNATAKA GRAMIN BANK

    Adv. B.B. LOKESHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LEELAVATHI

  2. 2.DIVYA H.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 22/2025 Summary: Karnataka Gramin Bank's suit against Leelavathi and Divya H. was disposed of by Lok Adalath on 14.03.2026 after the defendants paid the outstanding amount under One-Time Settlement (OTS) scheme. The court accepted the settlement memo filed by the bank's counsel and closed the case with no remaining dues, ordering refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 08-Jan-2026

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 13-Dec-2025

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  9. 18-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 08-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 22/2025 Summary: Karnataka Gramin Bank's suit against Leelavathi and Divya H. was disposed of by Lok Adalath on 14.03.2026 after the defendants paid the outstanding amount under One-Time Settlement (OTS) scheme. The court accepted the settlement memo filed by the bank's counsel and closed the case with no remaining dues, ordering refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case