KARNATAKA GRAMEENA BANK R/BY THE BRANCH MANAGER vs ANNAMMA — 355/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 24th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS300022322025
Filing Number
362/2025
Filing Date
20-Sep-2025
Registration No
355/2025
Registration Date
14-Oct-2025
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
921-I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARNATAKA GRAMEENA BANK R/BY THE BRANCH MANAGER
Adv. B.B. LOKESHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANNAMMA
-
2.SANTHOSH KUMAR
-
3.ARALAPPA
-
4.RAYAPPA
-
5.KLERA
-
6.LURDU MARY
-
7.RAJINA MARY
-
8.SATHISH KUMAR
-
9.SHANTHAPPA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court decreed Karnataka Grameena Bank's suit partly in its favor, holding the defendants liable to pay Rs. 6,66,496 outstanding across five agricultural loans with interest at 6% per annum. The court accepted the bank's documentary evidence and witness testimony, finding the defendants' default substantiated, while reducing the contractual interest rate to 6% on equity grounds and authorizing property sale in case of non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgements
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
21-Feb-2026
Judgements
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Feb-2026
Judgements
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
03-Feb-2026
ExhibitsView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
27-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 355/2025
Summary The court decreed Karnataka Grameena Bank's suit partly in its favor, holding the defendants liable to pay Rs. 6,66,496 outstanding across five agricultural loans with interest at 6% per annum. The court accepted the bank's documentary evidence and witness testimony, finding the defendants' default substantiated, while reducing the contractual interest rate to 6% on equity grounds and authorizing property sale in case of non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts