GIRISH S. vs SARITHA — 1137/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S,223,R/W/S,138. Status: Issue NBW. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS300022132024
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1144/2024
Filing Date
06-12-2024
Registration No
1137/2024
Registration Date
06-12-2024
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
446-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GIRISH S.
Adv. T.A. SHANKAREGOWDA
Respondent(s)
SARITHA
Hearing History
Judge: 446-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Issue NBW
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Issue NBW | |
| 01-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 18-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 04-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This is a civil case (CC No. 1137/2024) from Hunsur Court involving a loan dispute under IPC Section 351. The complainant Girish S. loaned ₹2,00,000 to the respondent Surita (wife of Mahadev Shetti) for business development, repayable in three months by July 21, 2024. The court examined evidence including a bounced cheque (dated October 29, 2024) and a legal notice served on November 4, 2024, establishing that the loan amount remains unpaid and a criminal complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 has been filed. The case proceeding recorded the respondent's statement and admitted documentary evidence (cheque, bank return memo, legal notice copies, and postal receipts as Exhibits 1-5). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil case (CC No. 1137/2024) from Hunsur Court involving a loan dispute under IPC Section 351. The complainant Girish S. loaned ₹2,00,000 to the respondent Surita (wife of Mahadev Shetti) for business development, repayable in three months by July 21, 2024. The court examined evidence including a bounced cheque (dated October 29, 2024) and a legal notice served on November 4, 2024, establishing that the loan amount remains unpaid and a criminal complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 has been filed. The case proceeding recorded the respondent's statement and admitted documentary evidence (cheque, bank return memo, legal notice copies, and postal receipts as Exhibits 1-5). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts