KARNATAKA GRAMEENA BANK R/BY THE BRANCH MANAGER vs PUTTAMMA — 329/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT on 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS300021192025
Filing Number
337/2025
Filing Date
16-09-2025
Registration No
329/2025
Registration Date
23-09-2025
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
921-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KARNATAKA GRAMEENA BANK R/BY THE BRANCH MANAGER
Adv. B.B. LOKESHA
Respondent(s)
PUTTAMMA
MAHADEVA
ERAPPA
SHIVARAMEGOWDA
Hearing History
Judge: 921-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Disposed
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court accepted the settlement memo filed by Karnataka Grameena Bank and defendants Puttamma, Mahadeva, and Erappa, who resolved their dispute through the OTS (One Time Settlement) scheme. The case was disposed as settled, court fees refunded to the plaintiff, and original documents ordered to be returned to the bank with photocopies retained by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court accepted the settlement memo filed by Karnataka Grameena Bank and defendants Puttamma, Mahadeva, and Erappa, who resolved their dispute through the OTS (One Time Settlement) scheme. The case was disposed as settled, court fees refunded to the plaintiff, and original documents ordered to be returned to the bank with photocopies retained by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts