H.P. LAKSHMANA vs RAJESH (ABATED) — 1071/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/S,279,338,304(A),R/W/S,146,196,181,IMV,ACT,209. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 24-Jul-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS300019692024

Filing Number

1078/2024

Filing Date

10-Oct-2024

Registration No

1071/2024

Registration Date

10-Oct-2024

Court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

921-I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section U/S,279,338,304(A),R/W/S,146,196,181,IMV,ACT,209

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H.P. LAKSHMANA

    Adv. M.BHASKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH (ABATED)

  2. 2.H.N. YOGESHA

Case History

  1. 24-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jul-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 1071/2024 Case: H.P. Lakshmana v. Rajesh (Abated) and H.N. Yogesha Outcome: The court scheduled witness examination for July 15, 2026. The petitioner's counsel (22-year practicing lawyer) argued that the first respondent died during case filing, and a chargesheet was filed against the petitioner based on the second respondent's statement. The court found the second respondent's testimony hearsay evidence without IPC Section 209 applicability. The petitioner contends the chargesheet contains false allegations of rash/negligent driving. The case remains pending with witness examination proceedings ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jul-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 02-Jul-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 17-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 20-May-2026

    ExhibitsView PDF

  7. 20-May-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  8. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  9. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  13. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  14. 22-Nov-2025

    For plea

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  15. 24-Oct-2025

    For plea

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  17. 12-Aug-2025

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  18. 05-Jul-2025

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  19. 18-Jun-2025

    For steps

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  20. 06-May-2025

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  21. 27-Mar-2025

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  22. 14-Feb-2025

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  23. 04-Jan-2025

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  24. 03-Jan-2025

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  25. 05-Dec-2024

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  26. 05-Nov-2024

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  27. 10-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 10-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1071/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 1071/2024 Case: H.P. Lakshmana v. Rajesh (Abated) and H.N. Yogesha Outcome: The court scheduled witness examination for July 15, 2026. The petitioner's counsel (22-year practicing lawyer) argued that the first respondent died during case filing, and a chargesheet was filed against the petitioner based on the second respondent's statement. The court found the second respondent's testimony hearsay evidence without IPC Section 209 applicability. The petitioner contends the chargesheet contains false allegations of rash/negligent driving. The case remains pending with witness examination proceedings ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case