Annayaiahnayaka vs Poojari Javaranayaka — 147/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S,7,Rule,1,R/W,Sec,26. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS300017072021
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
146/2021
Filing Date
01-10-2021
Registration No
147/2021
Registration Date
07-10-2021
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
921-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Annayaiahnayaka
Adv. S. Kemparaju
Renuka
Shivanna
Devammanni
Mahadevanayaka
Respondent(s)
Poojari Javaranayaka
Lakshmamma
Yogendrashetty
Krishnashetty
Mahadevashetty
Hearing History
Judge: 921-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
ARGUMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
Reply
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply | |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
The document is in Kannada and while readable, contains significant OCR degradation and formatting issues that make it difficult to extract a clear, definitive court order outcome. The text appears to be a property dispute case (O.S. 147/2021) involving disputed ownership of land, with testimony regarding property records from 1975 and subsequent transfers. The judgment discusses property registration documents, disputed claims to ownership, and witness testimony about the property's history. However, the specific final order (whether the petition/suit was allowed, dismissed, or adjourned) is not clearly discernible from the degraded text provided. SKIP This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The document is in Kannada and while readable, contains significant OCR degradation and formatting issues that make it difficult to extract a clear, definitive court order outcome. The text appears to be a property dispute case (O.S. 147/2021) involving disputed ownership of land, with testimony regarding property records from 1975 and subsequent transfers. The judgment discusses property registration documents, disputed claims to ownership, and witness testimony about the property's history. However, the specific final order (whether the petition/suit was allowed, dismissed, or adjourned) is not clearly discernible from the degraded text provided. SKIP This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts