SMT. SHANTHAMMA vs SHIVANNEGOWDA — 220/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 26R/W/O7, R 1. Status: APPEARANCE OF PARTY. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS300013242023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
220/2023
Filing Date
20-09-2023
Registration No
220/2023
Registration Date
20-09-2023
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
446-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT. SHANTHAMMA
Adv. NARASIMHA GOWDA
Respondent(s)
SHIVANNEGOWDA
BYREGOWDA
KRISHNEGOWDA
RAVIGOWDA
LOKESHA
SMT. MANJULA
Hearing History
Judge: 446-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
APPEARANCE OF PARTY
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTY | |
| 24-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 27-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected an application filed by Defendants No.1 and 4 seeking to dismiss the plaintiff's partition suit as barred by law. The court found that the prior compromise decree from 2013 remained a "paper decree" never acted upon by the parties, and that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law requiring a full trial. The application was dismissed with costs of Rs. 300. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected an application filed by Defendants No.1 and 4 seeking to dismiss the plaintiff's partition suit as barred by law. The court found that the prior compromise decree from 2013 remained a "paper decree" never acted upon by the parties, and that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law requiring a full trial. The application was dismissed with costs of Rs. 300. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts