T.P. NAGARAJU vs SAMYUKTHA PROPERTIES REP BY J. SURESH AND RADHAKRISHNA — 162/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7 Rule 1. Status: Settlement. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS300011032024
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
162/2024
Filing Date
26-06-2024
Registration No
162/2024
Registration Date
28-06-2024
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
446-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T.P. NAGARAJU
Adv. K.S. MAHADEVA PRASAD
SMT. LAKSHMAMMA
JAGADEESHA
Respondent(s)
SAMYUKTHA PROPERTIES REP BY J. SURESH AND RADHAKRISHNA
J. SURESH(Legal Heir)
RADHA KRISHNA
Hearing History
Judge: 446-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Settlement
Settlement
Settlement
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Settlement | |
| 07-03-2026 | Settlement | |
| 28-02-2026 | Settlement | |
| 13-02-2026 | Steps | |
| 17-01-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction (IA No. I) under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC seeking to restrain defendants from alienating 4 acres of agricultural property in Mysuru District pending suit disposal. The judge found no prima facie case, as the defendants' 24-month project completion timeline only commenced from the competent authority's approval order (March 5, 2024), and disputed payment amounts required full trial examination. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction (IA No. I) under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC seeking to restrain defendants from alienating 4 acres of agricultural property in Mysuru District pending suit disposal. The judge found no prima facie case, as the defendants' 24-month project completion timeline only commenced from the competent authority's approval order (March 5, 2024), and disputed payment amounts required full trial examination. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts