Bank of Baroda R/BY THE BRANCH MANAGER vs GOWDAIAH — 142/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 11th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS300008292025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
144/2025
Filing Date
16-04-2025
Registration No
142/2025
Registration Date
21-04-2025
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
446-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bank of Baroda R/BY THE BRANCH MANAGER
Adv. B.B. LOKESHA
Respondent(s)
GOWDAIAH
PUTTAMMA
KESHAVAMURTHY
SRINIVASA
NINGARAJAPPA
Hearing History
Judge: 446-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Disposed
JUDGEMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court partially decreed Bank of Baroda's suit for recovery of an agriculture crop loan against the defendants, holding them jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 8,65,540/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization (instead of the claimed 14.50%). The court applied Section 34 of CPC, which mandates 6% interest for agricultural loans, and gave the defendants six months to pay; failure would entitle the bank to seek a final decree for sale of mortgaged properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The court partially decreed Bank of Baroda's suit for recovery of an agriculture crop loan against the defendants, holding them jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 8,65,540/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization (instead of the claimed 14.50%). The court applied Section 34 of CPC, which mandates 6% interest for agricultural loans, and gave the defendants six months to pay; failure would entitle the bank to seek a final decree for sale of mortgaged properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts