R. NARAYANA vs B. PRASAD — 290/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/S 200. Status: Settlement. Next hearing: 11th July 2026.

Settlement Next hearing 11-Jul-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS300008222024

Filing Number

293/2024

Filing Date

03-Jun-2024

Registration No

290/2024

Registration Date

20-Jun-2024

Court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

446-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/S 200

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R. NARAYANA

    Adv. M.R.HARISH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.B. PRASAD

Case History

  1. 11-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  3. 06-May-2026

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Call On

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 30-Dec-2025

    Cross Examination

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    Cross Examination

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  9. 19-Nov-2025

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  10. 05-Nov-2025

    Cross Examination

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  11. 03-Oct-2025

    Issue NBW

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  12. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  13. 20-Aug-2025

    313 StatementView PDF

    Case 290/2024 Summary This is a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act involving a cheque bounce dispute. Petitioner R. Narayana accused respondent B. Prasad of issuing a cheque for Rs. 7,00,000 on 29.04.2024 that was dishonored by the bank on 04.05.2024 due to insufficient funds. The court examined Prasad (accused) under Section 313 CrPC on 20.08.2025, and he admitted to receiving the loan, issuing the cheque, and the bank's dishonor notice, but did not dispute the core allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  15. 06-Aug-2025

    PleaView PDF

  16. 06-Aug-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  17. 09-Jul-2025

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  18. 21-Jun-2025

    Issue NBW

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  19. 22-May-2025

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  20. 11-Apr-2025

    For plea

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  21. 08-Mar-2025

    For plea

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  22. 06-Mar-2025

    For plea

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  23. 19-Feb-2025

    For plea

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  24. 24-Jan-2025

    For plea

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  25. 13-Jan-2025

    For plea

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  26. 30-Dec-2024

    Re Issue NBW

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  27. 26-Nov-2024

    Re Issue NBW

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  28. 21-Oct-2024

    Re Issue NBW

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  29. 09-Sep-2024

    Issue NBW

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  30. 23-Jul-2024

    Re Issue Summons

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  31. 20-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 03-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 290/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 290/2024 Summary This is a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act involving a cheque bounce dispute. Petitioner R. Narayana accused respondent B. Prasad of issuing a cheque for Rs. 7,00,000 on 29.04.2024 that was dishonored by the bank on 04.05.2024 due to insufficient funds. The court examined Prasad (accused) under Section 313 CrPC on 20.08.2025, and he admitted to receiving the loan, issuing the cheque, and the bank's dishonor notice, but did not dispute the core allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case