BILIKERE POLICE STATION vs MANCHAPPA — 287/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S,187. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS300007892025

e-Filing Number

11-04-2025

Filing Number

289/2025

Filing Date

11-Apr-2025

Registration No

287/2025

Registration Date

11-Apr-2025

Court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

921-I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0001

Police Station

BILIKERE PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S,187
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/S,281,106

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BILIKERE POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANCHAPPA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case 287/2025 The court acquitted Manchappa of charges under Sections 281 and 106 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he drove the vehicle rash/negligently resulting in a death. While medical and investigative evidence confirmed a fatal road accident occurred, the court determined that the crucial eyewitness (PW-2) admitted he hadn't witnessed the actual collision, couldn't identify the vehicle or driver, and no independent eyewitness identified the accused as the driver. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 20-May-2026

    Judgements

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  11. 19-Feb-2026

    Orders

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Objections

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 05-Feb-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  15. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  16. 08-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 08-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  19. 18-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 18-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  22. 20-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 20-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 20-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  26. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  27. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  28. 16-Aug-2025

    For plea

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  29. 04-Aug-2025

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  30. 03-Jul-2025

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  31. 08-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 11-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 287/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 287/2025 The court acquitted Manchappa of charges under Sections 281 and 106 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he drove the vehicle rash/negligently resulting in a death. While medical and investigative evidence confirmed a fatal road accident occurred, the court determined that the crucial eyewitness (PW-2) admitted he hadn't witnessed the actual collision, couldn't identify the vehicle or driver, and no independent eyewitness identified the accused as the driver. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case