CHANNAKESHAVA J.C vs N. NAGARAJU — 68/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1,AND,2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR on 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS300003202025
Filing Number
68/2025
Filing Date
15-Feb-2025
Registration No
68/2025
Registration Date
21-Feb-2025
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
446-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANNAKESHAVA J.C
Adv. GIRISH
Respondent(s)
-
1.N. NAGARAJU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court accepted a compromise petition filed by both parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC and disposed of the suit accordingly. The compromise, supported by a sale deed dated 06.04.2026, was found to be voluntary and free from coercion or misrepresentation. Court fees were ordered to be refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
23-Mar-2026
Call On
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
14-Mar-2026
Call On
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
05-Feb-2026
Settlement
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
04-Aug-2025
IssueView PDF
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
24-Jul-2025
Issues
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
21-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
03-May-2025
Written Statement
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
03-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
27-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 68/2025
The court accepted a compromise petition filed by both parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC and disposed of the suit accordingly. The compromise, supported by a sale deed dated 06.04.2026, was found to be voluntary and free from coercion or misrepresentation. Court fees were ordered to be refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts