CHIKKADEVAMMA vs P.B. NAGARANI — 25/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS300001162024

Filing Number

24/2024

Filing Date

23-Jan-2024

Registration No

25/2024

Registration Date

25-Jan-2024

Court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

921-I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHIKKADEVAMMA

    Adv. CHANNA BASAPPA

  2. 2.RAVISHANKAR

  3. 3.JAYAMMA

  4. 4.MALLIKARJUNA G.B.

  5. 5.CHIKKAMMANI

  6. 6.SIDDA

  7. 7.BETTANAIKA

  8. 8.KRISHNA G.B.

  9. 9.SIDDAMMA

  10. 10.DEVAMMA

  11. 11.SAKAMMA

  12. 12.RADHA

  13. 13.SUDHARANI G.P

  14. 14.SANTHOSH G.P

  15. 15.SIDDANAIKA

  16. 16.LAKSHMI

  17. 17.MAHADEVANAIKA

  18. 18.SHIVANNA

  19. 19.DHRAMARAJU

  20. 20.JAYARAMANAIKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.B. NAGARANI

  2. 2.NARENDRA PRASAD T.

  3. 3.DHANALAKSHMI

  4. 4.SURENDRA T.

  5. 5.SHIVAKUMAR S.

  6. 6.VIJAYA KUMAR S.

  7. 7.KUMAR G.K.

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. 25/2024 Case Status: Case adjourned. Witness examination scheduled for 06.04.2026 with examination-in-chief to be recorded. The case involves a property dispute regarding ancestral land allegedly mortgaged to a bank by Patel Sidunayak. The petitioners (Chikkadevamma, Ravishankar, and Jayamma) challenge the mortgage transaction, claiming the property was divided equally among Sidunayak's three sons with family consent, and that each son's portion was separately mortgaged under respective R.T.C entries. Respondents 5 and 6's counsel sought adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  12. 24-Nov-2025

    ExhibitsView PDF

  13. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  14. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  15. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  16. 22-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  17. 12-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  18. 01-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  19. 14-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  20. 31-Jul-2025

    Call On

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  21. 23-Jul-2025

    Orders

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  22. 07-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  23. 27-Jun-2025

    Objections

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  24. 24-Jun-2025

    Objections

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  25. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  26. 28-Mar-2025

    IssueView PDF

  27. 28-Mar-2025

    IssueView PDF

  28. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  29. 11-Mar-2025

    Issues

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  30. 25-Feb-2025

    Objection on IA

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  31. 10-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  32. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  33. 13-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  34. 10-Dec-2024

    IssueView PDF

  35. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  36. 27-Nov-2024

    Issues

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  37. 29-Oct-2024

    Appearance Of Party

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  38. 30-Sep-2024

    Re Issue Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  39. 27-Aug-2024

    Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  40. 29-Jul-2024

    Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  41. 26-Jun-2024

    Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  42. 29-May-2024

    Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  43. 22-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  44. 01-Apr-2024

    Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  45. 02-Mar-2024

    Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  46. 03-Feb-2024

    Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  47. 02-Feb-2024

    Orders

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  48. 01-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  49. 30-Jan-2024

    Orders

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  50. 29-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 23-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. 25/2024 Case Status: Case adjourned. Witness examination scheduled for 06.04.2026 with examination-in-chief to be recorded. The case involves a property dispute regarding ancestral land allegedly mortgaged to a bank by Patel Sidunayak. The petitioners (Chikkadevamma, Ravishankar, and Jayamma) challenge the mortgage transaction, claiming the property was divided equally among Sidunayak's three sons with family consent, and that each son's portion was separately mortgaged under respective R.T.C entries. Respondents 5 and 6's counsel sought adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case