Manukumar vs T. Mahadeva — 23/2020
Case under U/s 200 of Cr.p.c. R/w Sec. 138 of N.i Act. Section -. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED on 07th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS300000782020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
23/2020
Filing Date
02-01-2020
Registration No
23/2020
Registration Date
18-01-2020
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
921-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manukumar
Adv. E. Mahesh
Respondent(s)
T. Mahadeva
Hearing History
Judge: 921-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Disposed
JUDGEMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-02-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 07-02-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 31-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 29-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC of Hunsur convicted T. Mahadeva under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque for Rs. 4,00,000/- issued to repay a loan. The court found the complainant's testimony credible and consistent with documentary evidence, while the accused's defense of cheque misuse lacked supporting material and contradicted normal conduct. The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 4,10,000/-, with Rs. 4,05,000/- as compensation to the complainant and Rs. 5,000/- to the state; default imprisonment is five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC of Hunsur convicted T. Mahadeva under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque for Rs. 4,00,000/- issued to repay a loan. The court found the complainant's testimony credible and consistent with documentary evidence, while the accused's defense of cheque misuse lacked supporting material and contradicted normal conduct. The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 4,10,000/-, with Rs. 4,05,000/- as compensation to the complainant and Rs. 5,000/- to the state; default imprisonment is five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts