H P JANAMMA vs SHIVANANJAIAH — 3/2026

Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal challenging the trial court's rejection of her interim injunction application in a property dispute. The appellate court upheld the trial court's finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for possession, holding that revenue records alone raise only a rebuttable presumption of ownership, which the defendants effectively rebutted through survey reports and evidence showing their continuous 72-year possession. The court emphasized that actual physical possession is the primary consideration in injunction suits, and the balance of convenience favored the defendants who were already in possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.