SHARAVANAN vs MALLEGOWDA — 14/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS300000602026

Filing Number

14/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

14/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR

Judge

446-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,RULE,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHARAVANAN

    Adv. M.E.MAHESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALLEGOWDA

  2. 2.KALAMMA

  3. 3.MALLESHA

  4. 4.YASHODHA

  5. 5.JAYALAKSHMI

  6. 6.KAVYA

  7. 7.S JYOTHI

  8. 8.PARVATHI S

  9. 9.BABY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: 14/2026 (Sharavanan v. Mallegowda & others) The court accepted the joint compromise petition filed under Section 20 of the Karnataka Legal Services Authorities Act. The case was disposed through Lok Adalath proceedings based on the settlement agreed between the parties, with a decree drawn in accordance with the compromise terms. The plaintiff's court fee was refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Settlement

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 14/2026 (Sharavanan v. Mallegowda & others) The court accepted the joint compromise petition filed under Section 20 of the Karnataka Legal Services Authorities Act. The case was disposed through Lok Adalath proceedings based on the settlement agreed between the parties, with a decree drawn in accordance with the compromise terms. The plaintiff's court fee was refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case