Gurumallappa vs Kamalamma — 3/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 of Cpc. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 01st June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS300000502022
Filing Number
4/2022
Filing Date
05-01-2022
Registration No
3/2022
Registration Date
11-01-2022
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
921-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gurumallappa
Adv. Shivappa
Respondent(s)
Kamalamma
Jagadambha
Latha
Savithramma
Manjula
Girisha
Hearing History
Judge: 921-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNSUR
Disposed
JUDGEMENTS
JUDGEMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | JUDGEMENTS |
| 06-04-2026 | JUDGEMENTS |
| 04-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 01-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Gurumallappa v. Kamalamma and Others (O.S. 3/2022) The court decreed the plaintiff's partition suit, holding that the suit schedule properties are ancestral joint family properties of the three sons of Doddaningappa (plaintiff Gurumallappa and his brothers Mallikarjun and Chandrappa), and that the defendants failed to prove an earlier partition or exclusive ownership. The plaintiff was granted partition and separate possession of his 1/3rd share in the agricultural lands, with the court rejecting the defendants' non-joinder of parties plea and directing final decree proceedings to determine the exact allotment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Gurumallappa v. Kamalamma and Others (O.S. 3/2022) The court decreed the plaintiff's partition suit, holding that the suit schedule properties are ancestral joint family properties of the three sons of Doddaningappa (plaintiff Gurumallappa and his brothers Mallikarjun and Chandrappa), and that the defendants failed to prove an earlier partition or exclusive ownership. The plaintiff was granted partition and separate possession of his 1/3rd share in the agricultural lands, with the court rejecting the defendants' non-joinder of parties plea and directing final decree proceedings to determine the exact allotment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts