AMMANAMMA vs KULLANAYAKA — 358/2022

Case under U/s 26 and Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc Section O. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS210072042022

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

357/2022

Filing Date

12-09-2022

Registration No

358/2022

Registration Date

13-09-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

1320-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFCH D KOTE

Acts & Sections

U/S 26 and order VII Rule 1 of CPC Section O

Petitioner(s)

AMMANAMMA

Adv. G.N.NARAYANA GOWDA

NAGARATHNA

RAJAMMA

JAYALAKSHMI

Respondent(s)

KULLANAYAKA

CHIKKANAYAKA

KIVUDANAYAKA

TOLASAMMA

SHEKHARA

KUMARA

LAKSHMAMMA

Hearing History

Judge: 1320-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFCH D KOTE

23-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

27-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

26-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

26-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

17-09-2022
Orders
25-09-2023
Deposition
15-11-2023
Deposition
26-02-2024
Issue
13-08-2024
Deposition
23-09-2024
Deposition
28-10-2024
Deposition
14-11-2024
Deposition
31-01-2025
Deposition
12-02-2025
Deposition
15-04-2025
Deposition
29-07-2025
Deposition
22-08-2025
Deposition
12-01-2026
Deposition
23-02-2026
Deposition

Summary: In O.S. No. 358/2022, the court continued the main examination and cross-examination of witnesses on 23.02.2026. The plaintiff's counsel presented documents marked as Exh. P-25 through P-29, while the defendant's counsel challenged the authenticity of certain exhibits (P-26 and P-27), contending they were not available during the original trial period. The court admitted the exhibits and proceeded with witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. No. 358/2022, the court continued the main examination and cross-examination of witnesses on 23.02.2026. The plaintiff's counsel presented documents marked as Exh. P-25 through P-29, while the defendant's counsel challenged the authenticity of certain exhibits (P-26 and P-27), contending they were not available during the original trial period. The court admitted the exhibits and proceeded with witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case