KRISHNEGOWDA vs CHINNEGOWDA — 333/2022
Case under U/s 26 and Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc Section O. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS210071132022
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
331/2022
Filing Date
24-08-2022
Registration No
333/2022
Registration Date
24-08-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
1320-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFCH D KOTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KRISHNEGOWDA
Adv. P.NAGENDRA
NAGAMMA
Respondent(s)
CHINNEGOWDA
LOKESHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1320-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFCH D KOTE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 03-12-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 30-10-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 08-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this land dispute case (O.S. No. 333/22), the court examined witness testimony on 03.12.2025 regarding ownership and boundaries of disputed land parcels. The court found that the defendant's claim regarding a canal boundary between the plaintiff's and defendant's land was established, and noted discrepancies in survey records (Survey No. 26 vs. 19) regarding land ownership. The court concluded that the defendant filed a false claim with the intent to wrongfully appropriate 28 guntas of the plaintiff's land that the defendant had obtained through fraudulent means. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this land dispute case (O.S. No. 333/22), the court examined witness testimony on 03.12.2025 regarding ownership and boundaries of disputed land parcels. The court found that the defendant's claim regarding a canal boundary between the plaintiff's and defendant's land was established, and noted discrepancies in survey records (Survey No. 26 vs. 19) regarding land ownership. The court concluded that the defendant filed a false claim with the intent to wrongfully appropriate 28 guntas of the plaintiff's land that the defendant had obtained through fraudulent means. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts