GIRISH vs THE THASILDAR — 1106/2025

Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS210043732025

Filing Number

1108/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

1106/2025

Registration Date

24-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

1095-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GIRISH

    Adv. APP

  2. 2.NANJAPPA K P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE THASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary The court allowed the petition and directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt.Mahadevamma (deceased on 06.05.2005) and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioners had established the fact of death through credible evidence including village records and public notice, and since the respondent failed to contest the petition, the unchallenged evidence warranted registration under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 14-Jan-2026

    Paper Publication

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  7. 26-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1106/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the petition and directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt.Mahadevamma (deceased on 06.05.2005) and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioners had established the fact of death through credible evidence including village records and public notice, and since the respondent failed to contest the petition, the unchallenged evidence warranted registration under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case