R. NATARAJ vs VENKATESH — 2673/2021

Case under Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS210039182021

Case disposed

Filing Number

2671/2021

Filing Date

06-12-2021

Registration No

2673/2021

Registration Date

06-12-2021

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

R. NATARAJ

Adv. G.N.NARAYANA GOWDA

Respondent(s)

VENKATESH

Hearing History

Judge: 445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Refer to LA/Mediation

11-02-2026

Refer to LA/Mediation

05-01-2026

EVIDENCE

06-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

The Lok Adalath approved a joint compromise petition filed by petitioner R. Nataraj and respondent Venkatesh, settling their Negotiable Instruments Act dispute for Rs. 2,00,000. The accused paid Rs. 1,00,000 to the complainant and agreed to pay the remaining balance, with the court directing release of Rs. 42,000 in deposit to the complainant. The case is closed as settled, with liberty for the complainant to pursue legal remedies if the compromise terms are violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-01-2023
Deposition
24-06-2025
Deposition
14-11-2025
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath approved a joint compromise petition filed by petitioner R. Nataraj and respondent Venkatesh, settling their Negotiable Instruments Act dispute for Rs. 2,00,000. The accused paid Rs. 1,00,000 to the complainant and agreed to pay the remaining balance, with the court directing release of Rs. 42,000 in deposit to the complainant. The case is closed as settled, with liberty for the complainant to pursue legal remedies if the compromise terms are violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case