KRISHNA vs THE THASILDAR — 996/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS210038492025
Filing Number
999/2025
Filing Date
03-Dec-2025
Registration No
996/2025
Registration Date
05-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
1095-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRISHNA
Adv. SRINIVASA .V
-
2.NAGARATHNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE THASILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Mahadevamma (who died on 07.05.1994) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found that the petitioners had sufficiently proved the death through credible evidence including village accountant reports, genealogical records, and newspaper notifications, and since the respondent appeared ex-parte without contesting the claim, the unchallenged evidence warranted approval of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
03-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
08-Jan-2026
Paper Publication
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
05-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 996/2025
The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Mahadevamma (who died on 07.05.1994) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found that the petitioners had sufficiently proved the death through credible evidence including village accountant reports, genealogical records, and newspaper notifications, and since the respondent appeared ex-parte without contesting the claim, the unchallenged evidence warranted approval of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts