KRISHNA vs THE THASILDAR — 996/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS210038492025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

999/2025

Filing Date

03-12-2025

Registration No

996/2025

Registration Date

05-12-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

1095-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

KRISHNA

Adv. SRINIVASA .V

NAGARATHNA

Respondent(s)

THE THASILDAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1095-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

07-03-2026

Disposed

03-03-2026

ORDERS

08-01-2026

PAPER PUBLICATION

05-12-2025

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Orders

The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Mahadevamma (who died on 07.05.1994) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found that the petitioners had sufficiently proved the death through credible evidence including village accountant reports, genealogical records, and newspaper notifications, and since the respondent appeared ex-parte without contesting the claim, the unchallenged evidence warranted approval of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

03-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Mahadevamma (who died on 07.05.1994) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found that the petitioners had sufficiently proved the death through credible evidence including village accountant reports, genealogical records, and newspaper notifications, and since the respondent appeared ex-parte without contesting the claim, the unchallenged evidence warranted approval of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case