RATHNAMMA vs THE THASILDAR — 895/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS210035592025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

897/2025

Filing Date

14-11-2025

Registration No

895/2025

Registration Date

14-11-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

1095-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

RATHNAMMA

Adv. MAHADEVAPPA

CHANNAMMA

SANNAMMA

SAKAMMA

Respondent(s)

THE THASILDAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1095-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

13-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDERS

22-01-2026

ENQUIRY

29-12-2025

PAPER PUBLICATION

27-12-2025

STEPS

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Orders

Summary The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Sri. Dasanayaka (died 01.04.1975) and issue a death certificate. The petitioners sought registration because the death was not recorded in official registers, preventing them from updating property records (katha). The court found the petitioners' unchallenged evidence sufficient, relying on the principle that courts need only verify the fact of death, not the exact date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Sri. Dasanayaka (died 01.04.1975) and issue a death certificate. The petitioners sought registration because the death was not recorded in official registers, preventing them from updating property records (katha). The court found the petitioners' unchallenged evidence sufficient, relying on the principle that courts need only verify the fact of death, not the exact date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case