JAYA RAJ vs THE THASILDAR — 333/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S26O7R1. Status: Judgements. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Judgements Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS210033952025

Filing Number

330/2025

Filing Date

16-Oct-2025

Registration No

333/2025

Registration Date

27-Oct-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section S26O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYA RAJ

    Adv. S. KARIGOWDA

  2. 2.MATHIYAS

  3. 3.VIJAYAKUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE THASILDAR

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgements

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    In O.S. No. 333/2025, a witness was examined on 26.02.2026 and cross-examination was held. Documents dated 07.04.1973 were produced and marked as exhibits (NP-9 through NP-12, including three Aadhaar cards). The court found no grounds for party challenge against the defendant as the defendant appeared unopposed, and the witness statement was recorded in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  9. 22-Nov-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  10. 28-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 333/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In O.S. No. 333/2025, a witness was examined on 26.02.2026 and cross-examination was held. Documents dated 07.04.1973 were produced and marked as exhibits (NP-9 through NP-12, including three Aadhaar cards). The court found no grounds for party challenge against the defendant as the defendant appeared unopposed, and the witness statement was recorded in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case