MAHADEVEGOWDA vs THE THASILDAR — 769/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS210032172025
Filing Number
774/2025
Filing Date
19-Sep-2025
Registration No
769/2025
Registration Date
20-Sep-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
1095-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHADEVEGOWDA
Adv. MAHADEV
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE THASILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary of Case 769/2025 The court allowed Mahadevegowda's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of his father, Sri. Marivenkategowda (died 20.08.1984), and issue a death certificate. The petitioner's unchallenged evidence, including village records and genealogical documentation, established the death fact despite the Tahsildar's non-availability certificate. Following established precedent, the court held that factum of death—not the exact date—is the material consideration for such registrations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
11-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
17-Jan-2026
Paper Publication
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
22-Nov-2025
Steps
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
25-Oct-2025
Steps
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
20-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 769/2025
Summary of Case 769/2025 The court allowed Mahadevegowda's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of his father, Sri. Marivenkategowda (died 20.08.1984), and issue a death certificate. The petitioner's unchallenged evidence, including village records and genealogical documentation, established the death fact despite the Tahsildar's non-availability certificate. Following established precedent, the court held that factum of death—not the exact date—is the material consideration for such registrations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts