V.RASHMI vs VENKATASHEETY Advocate - D.S.MALATHI — 227/2021
Case under U/s 26 and Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc Section O. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS210030582021
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
235/2021
Filing Date
24-09-2021
Registration No
227/2021
Registration Date
07-10-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V.RASHMI
Adv. G.N.NARAYANA GOWDA
Respondent(s)
VENKATASHEETY Advocate - D.S.MALATHI
BHAGYAMMA
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
SURESH V
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
RATHNAMMA
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
PRAKASH
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
RAJESH
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
JAYALAXMI
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
GEETA
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
LAKSHAMMA
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
LAKSHAMMA
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
VEMKATESH
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
PUTTAMMA
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
KAVITHA
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
NANJUNDASHETTY
Adv. D.S.MALATHI
V.K.CHALUVARAJ SHETTY
Adv. D.R.MAHESHA
Hearing History
Judge: 445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 28-11-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 30-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary O.S. No. 227/2021 – In this civil case involving property disputes, the court examined witness testimony on 24.01.2026 and evaluated claims regarding the sale and ownership of multiple properties (Schedule Items 1-5). The court found that the plaintiff (PW-01/Rashmi) has no rightful claim or interest in the disputed properties, as they were either the self-acquired assets of the plaintiff's mother or were properly divided among family members. The petition is dismissed, with the court ruling that the plaintiff possesses no legal right to any portion of the disputed properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary O.S. No. 227/2021 – In this civil case involving property disputes, the court examined witness testimony on 24.01.2026 and evaluated claims regarding the sale and ownership of multiple properties (Schedule Items 1-5). The court found that the plaintiff (PW-01/Rashmi) has no rightful claim or interest in the disputed properties, as they were either the self-acquired assets of the plaintiff's mother or were properly divided among family members. The petition is dismissed, with the court ruling that the plaintiff possesses no legal right to any portion of the disputed properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts