H.D.KOTE POLICE STATION vs SHETTYGOWDA — 1795/2021

Case under Karnataka Excise Act-1965 Section 32,34. Status: Judgements. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Judgements Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS210026652021

Filing Number

1795/2021

Filing Date

27-Aug-2021

Registration No

1795/2021

Registration Date

27-Aug-2021

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

277

Police Station

H.D.KOTE PS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Excise Act-1965 Section 32,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H.D.KOTE POLICE STATION

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHETTYGOWDA

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Judgements

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 19-May-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  5. 25-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  8. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 1795/2021 H.D. Kote Police Station v. Shettygowda This case involves the examination of a police witness (Kiran Kumar, 31-year-old constable) regarding an alleged illegal liquor operation. The witness testified on 23.02.2026 about a raid conducted on 07.11.2020 on a shop operated by the respondent Shettygowda, during which 180 ML of Old Tavern whiskey pouches and 90 ML of Original Chivas whiskey pouches were allegedly seized. The respondent's counsel challenged the credibility of the investigation, arguing that no mahazar (formal record) was prepared at the scene, no documents were produced to establish the shop owner's identity, no evidence labels bore the witness's signature, and the witness made no statement to investigating officers. The court found the witness testimony credible regarding identification of the respondent and seized items, but the cross-examination raised serious procedural deficiencies in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  12. 14-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  14. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  15. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  17. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  18. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  19. 19-May-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  20. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  21. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  22. 15-Jan-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  24. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  25. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  26. 12-Nov-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  27. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  28. 07-Oct-2024

    Proclomation

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  29. 13-Aug-2024

    Proclomation

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  30. 30-Jul-2024

    Proclomation

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  31. 02-Jul-2024

    Proclomation

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  32. 04-Jun-2024

    Proclomation

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  33. 08-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  34. 11-Mar-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  35. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  36. 23-Jan-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  37. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  38. 15-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  39. 05-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  40. 26-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  41. 06-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  42. 21-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  43. 21-Sep-2022

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  44. 06-Jul-2022

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  45. 21-Apr-2022

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  46. 29-Dec-2021

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  47. 13-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 27-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1795/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 1795/2021 H.D. Kote Police Station v. Shettygowda This case involves the examination of a police witness (Kiran Kumar, 31-year-old constable) regarding an alleged illegal liquor operation. The witness testified on 23.02.2026 about a raid conducted on 07.11.2020 on a shop operated by the respondent Shettygowda, during which 180 ML of Old Tavern whiskey pouches and 90 ML of Original Chivas whiskey pouches were allegedly seized. The respondent's counsel challenged the credibility of the investigation, arguing that no mahazar (formal record) was prepared at the scene, no documents were produced to establish the shop owner's identity, no evidence labels bore the witness's signature, and the witness made no statement to investigating officers. The court found the witness testimony credible regarding identification of the respondent and seized items, but the cross-examination raised serious procedural deficiencies in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case