CHIKKANNANAYAKA vs BETTANAYAKA — 1251/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS210023332025
Filing Number
1251/2025
Filing Date
28-Jul-2025
Registration No
1251/2025
Registration Date
28-Jul-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHIKKANNANAYAKA
Adv. M.B. SREENIVASA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BETTANAYAKA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
In this Lok Adalath case, the court approved a joint settlement between petitioner Chikkannanayaka and respondent Bettanayaka, wherein the respondent consented to register the petitioner's date of birth (23/05/2005) in the birth register under the name Eshwara S/o. Appaswamy. The court directed the respondent to make the required entry and issue a birth certificate to the petitioner upon collection of the necessary fee, and closed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
03-Mar-2026
Refer to La/Mediation
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
30-Dec-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
19-Nov-2025
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
03-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1251/2025
In this Lok Adalath case, the court approved a joint settlement between petitioner Chikkannanayaka and respondent Bettanayaka, wherein the respondent consented to register the petitioner's date of birth (23/05/2005) in the birth register under the name Eshwara S/o. Appaswamy. The court directed the respondent to make the required entry and issue a birth certificate to the petitioner upon collection of the necessary fee, and closed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts