GURUBASAVAIAH vs BASAVAIAH @ RAJAIAH — 424/2013
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 0. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 24th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS210023072013
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
424/2013
Filing Date
16-12-2013
Registration No
424/2013
Registration Date
16-12-2013
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
1095-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GURUBASAVAIAH
Adv. P. NAGENDRA
Respondent(s)
BASAVAIAH @ RAJAIAH
-
-
-
-
-
Hearing History
Judge: 1095-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE
Disposed
JUDGEMENTS
FOR CLARIFICATION
JUDGEMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 18-03-2026 | FOR CLARIFICATION | |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENTS | |
| 11-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court decreed the plaintiff's partition suit in part, holding that the plaintiff and defendant are joint Hindu family members with equal shares in ancestral joint family property (3 acres in Survey No. 29). The court awarded the plaintiff's legal heirs 20 guntas (0.5 acres) of land as their legitimate share, finding the defendant failed to prove his claim of absolute ownership through Land Tribunal occupancy rights. The case was partly allowed with parties bearing their own costs, and parties were given time to mutually agree on partition by metes and bounds before final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court decreed the plaintiff's partition suit in part, holding that the plaintiff and defendant are joint Hindu family members with equal shares in ancestral joint family property (3 acres in Survey No. 29). The court awarded the plaintiff's legal heirs 20 guntas (0.5 acres) of land as their legitimate share, finding the defendant failed to prove his claim of absolute ownership through Land Tribunal occupancy rights. The case was partly allowed with parties bearing their own costs, and parties were given time to mutually agree on partition by metes and bounds before final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts