H.D.KOTE POLICE STATION vs Chowdamma — 484/2023

Case under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 Section 81. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS210020752023

e-Filing Number

29-09-2023

Filing Number

484/2023

Filing Date

29-Sep-2023

Registration No

484/2023

Registration Date

29-Sep-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0119

Police Station

H.D.KOTE PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 Section 81
Indian Penal Code Section 511,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H.D.KOTE POLICE STATION

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chowdamma

  2. 2.Vedavathi

  3. 3.Purnima

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  5. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  7. 29-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 484/2023 Court: Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, H.D. Kote, Mysore District Parties: H.D. Kote Police Station (Petitioner) vs. Chowdamma, Vedavathi, and Purnima (Respondents) Outcome: A witness (Latha, 38 years old) was examined on 29.10.2025 and testified regarding an illegal child transfer case. The witness's testimony was partially contradictory—she denied certain allegations but confirmed knowledge of the incident involving unlawful transfer of a female child on 07.04.2022 and 09.04.2022. The contradicted portion of her statement was marked as exhibit. No cross-examination was conducted by the accused's counsel. The case proceedings were recorded in open court and the witness examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  9. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  10. 04-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  12. 07-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 07-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 07-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  16. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  17. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  18. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  19. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  20. 11-Nov-2024

    ChargeView PDF

  21. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  22. 25-Sep-2024

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  23. 20-Aug-2024

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  24. 22-Jul-2024

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  25. 22-Mar-2024

    Hear Before Charge - Hbc

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  26. 11-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 29-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 484/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 484/2023 Court: Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, H.D. Kote, Mysore District Parties: H.D. Kote Police Station (Petitioner) vs. Chowdamma, Vedavathi, and Purnima (Respondents) Outcome: A witness (Latha, 38 years old) was examined on 29.10.2025 and testified regarding an illegal child transfer case. The witness's testimony was partially contradictory—she denied certain allegations but confirmed knowledge of the incident involving unlawful transfer of a female child on 07.04.2022 and 09.04.2022. The contradicted portion of her statement was marked as exhibit. No cross-examination was conducted by the accused's counsel. The case proceedings were recorded in open court and the witness examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case