P B RAJANNA vs NANJAPPA — 366/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 O 7 R 1-2. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 22nd August 2026.

Orders Next hearing 22-Aug-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS210019812023

Filing Number

375/2023

Filing Date

14-Sep-2023

Registration No

366/2023

Registration Date

14-Sep-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

1095-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 O 7 R 1-2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P B RAJANNA

    Adv. T N NAGANANDA

  2. 2.P D BASAVARAJU

  3. 3.BASAVANNA P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NANJAPPA

  2. 2.MALLESHA

  3. 3.PRABHUSWAMY

  4. 4.MAHADEVAPPA

  5. 5.SHIVAMALLAPPA

  6. 6.PAAPACHI

  7. 7.SATHISHA

  8. 8.P M MAHADEVAPPA

  9. 9.P M MANJUSWAMY

  10. 10.P M SHIVAKUMARA

  11. 11.MALLANNA

Case History

  1. 22-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 27-Nov-2025

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  5. 26-Sep-2025

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 08-Sep-2025

    Objections

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  7. 11-Aug-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 366/2023 Summary: The court allowed Plaintiff No. 3's application under Section 151 CPC seeking removal of an illegal fence erected by defendants on disputed property. The court found that despite an appellate court order (MA No. 15/2024) directing status-quo maintenance, defendants closed a passage (galli) with a fence, obstructing plaintiff's access. Photographic evidence confirmed the fence was erected after the appellate order. The court directed defendants to immediately remove the illegal fence and comply with the status-quo order until suit disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  9. 17-Jul-2025

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  10. 05-Jul-2025

    Objections

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  11. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  12. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  13. 23-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  14. 12-Sep-2024

    IssueView PDF

  15. 12-Sep-2024

    OrdersView PDF

  16. 12-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  17. 13-Aug-2024

    Orders On IA

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  18. 28-Jun-2024

    Orders On IA

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  19. 30-Mar-2024

    Orders On IA

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  20. 27-Feb-2024

    Orders On IA

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  21. 03-Jan-2024

    Hg On IA

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  22. 04-Dec-2023

    Hg On IA

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  23. 29-Nov-2023

    Hg On IA

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  24. 27-Oct-2023

    Objections

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  25. 07-Oct-2023

    Notice

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  26. 15-Sep-2023

    OrdersView PDF

  27. 15-Sep-2023

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  28. 14-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 14-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 366/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 366/2023 Summary: The court allowed Plaintiff No. 3's application under Section 151 CPC seeking removal of an illegal fence erected by defendants on disputed property. The court found that despite an appellate court order (MA No. 15/2024) directing status-quo maintenance, defendants closed a passage (galli) with a fence, obstructing plaintiff's access. Photographic evidence confirmed the fence was erected after the appellate order. The court directed defendants to immediately remove the illegal fence and comply with the status-quo order until suit disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case