MANTAIAH vs H.D.KOTE TALUK CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION REP BY M.C.DODDANAYAKA — 362/2017
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 1. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS210014012017
Filing Number
357/2017
Filing Date
26-Oct-2017
Registration No
362/2017
Registration Date
26-Oct-2017
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
1095-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANTAIAH
Adv. S.SHIVANNE GOWDA
-
2.KENDAGANNAPPA
Respondent(s)
-
1.H.D.KOTE TALUK CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION REP BY M.C.DODDANAYAKA
-
2.H.D.KOTE TALUK CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION SECRETARY REP BY A.D.THOMAS
-
3.SMT.MANJULA
-
4.C.N.SHATYANARAYANA
Case History
-
27-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
17-Mar-2026
Objections
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
20-Jan-2026
Objections
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
12-Dec-2025
Objections
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
03-Dec-2025
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
10-Nov-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS No. 362/2017 Outcome: The court held the preliminary issue in the negative, ruling that the court has pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit. The court fee paid by plaintiffs (Rs. 25/-) was found correct and proper. Key Facts: Plaintiffs, as members of H.D. Kote Taluk Contractors Society, alleged that defendants (President and Secretary) fraudulently sold society-owned properties to defendants 3 and 4 in their personal names. Plaintiffs sought permanent injunction against property alienation, valued the suit under Section 26(c) of KCF and Stamp Valuation Act. Holding: Although property value exceeded 5 lakhs, pecuniary jurisdiction does not apply to suits for bare/permanent injunction—only to suits for other reliefs like recovery of possession or damages. Court upheld maintainability of the suit and allowed proceedings to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Nov-2025
To Hear
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
18-Oct-2025
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
18-Sep-2025
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
06-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
06-Sep-2025
Hearing
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
06-Aug-2025
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
25-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Jul-2025
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
27-Jun-2025
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
21-Mar-2025
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
13-Feb-2025
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
04-Dec-2024
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
16-Oct-2024
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
21-Aug-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
21-Aug-2024
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
08-Jul-2024
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
20-Mar-2024
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
23-Jan-2024
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
20-Nov-2023
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
21-Aug-2023
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
03-Jul-2023
Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
22-May-2023
IssueView PDF
-
22-May-2023
Call On
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
20-Mar-2023
Issues
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
04-Jan-2023
Call On
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
23-Nov-2022
Objections
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
29-Sep-2022
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
22-Aug-2022
Amended Plaint
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
11-Jul-2022
Notice
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
19-Apr-2022
Notice
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
08-Mar-2022
Notice
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
18-Jan-2022
Objections
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
26-Oct-2021
Objections
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
24-Aug-2021
Notice
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
05-Jul-2021
Notice
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
20-Apr-2021
Notice
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
29-Mar-2021
Steps
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
15-Mar-2021
Steps
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
02-Feb-2021
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
08-Dec-2020
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
14-Oct-2020
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
18-Aug-2020
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
28-Jul-2020
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
17-Jun-2020
Issues
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
07-Apr-2020
Issues
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
23-Jan-2020
Issues
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
25-Oct-2019
89 Of C.P.C.
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
10-Jul-2019
89 Of C.P.C.
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
10-Jun-2019
Written Stmt
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
27-May-2019
Written Stmt
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
12-Apr-2019
Written Stmt
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
16-Mar-2019
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
08-Mar-2019
Steps
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
06-Dec-2018
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
29-Oct-2018
Appearance Of Party
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
29-Jun-2018
Appearance Of Party
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
13-Apr-2018
Appearance Of Party
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
12-Dec-2017
Call On
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
30-Oct-2017
Call On
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
27-Oct-2017
Appearance Of Party
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
26-Oct-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Oct-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 362/2017
Case Summary: OS No. 362/2017 Outcome: The court held the preliminary issue in the negative, ruling that the court has pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit. The court fee paid by plaintiffs (Rs. 25/-) was found correct and proper. Key Facts: Plaintiffs, as members of H.D. Kote Taluk Contractors Society, alleged that defendants (President and Secretary) fraudulently sold society-owned properties to defendants 3 and 4 in their personal names. Plaintiffs sought permanent injunction against property alienation, valued the suit under Section 26(c) of KCF and Stamp Valuation Act. Holding: Although property value exceeded 5 lakhs, pecuniary jurisdiction does not apply to suits for bare/permanent injunction—only to suits for other reliefs like recovery of possession or damages. Court upheld maintainability of the suit and allowed proceedings to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts