SARAGUR POLICE STATION vs THIMEGOWDA — 515/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323324504. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS210011092019
Filing Number
515/2019
Filing Date
06-Aug-2019
Registration No
515/2019
Registration Date
06-Aug-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
1095-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
SARGUR PS
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARAGUR POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.THIMEGOWDA
-
2.MARAMMA
-
3.PUNEETHRAJ
-
4.NINGARAJU
Case History
-
12-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
09-Jul-2025
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
09-May-2025
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
11-Feb-2025
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
06-Dec-2024
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
25-Oct-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
12-Sep-2024
Orders
SUMMARY: The court dismissed the discharge application filed by Accused No.3 (Punithraj) under Section 239 of Cr.PC. The charge sheet alleged assault with a wooden club causing injuries under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, and 506. The court found that eyewitnesses and the complainant's statement prima facie established the accused's involvement, and premature discharge would defeat the trial, which can only proceed through witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Sep-2024
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
04-Jul-2024
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
06-Jun-2024
To Hear
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
15-May-2024
To Hear
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
19-Apr-2024
To Hear
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
17-Feb-2024
To Hear
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
14-Dec-2023
To Hear
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
09-Nov-2023
To Hear
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
24-Aug-2023
Objections
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
05-Jun-2023
Objections
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
20-Mar-2023
Objections
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
07-Feb-2023
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
30-Dec-2022
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
07-Nov-2022
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
01-Sep-2022
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
11-Jul-2022
Hear Before Charge - Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
08-Jul-2022
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
31-Mar-2022
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
18-Feb-2022
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
14-Dec-2021
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
07-Oct-2021
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
10-Aug-2021
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
15-Jun-2021
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
19-Mar-2021
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
21-Jan-2021
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
20-Nov-2020
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
23-Sep-2020
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
23-Jul-2020
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
06-Jun-2020
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
27-Mar-2020
NBW Issued
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
21-Dec-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 515/2019
SUMMARY: The court dismissed the discharge application filed by Accused No.3 (Punithraj) under Section 239 of Cr.PC. The charge sheet alleged assault with a wooden club causing injuries under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, and 506. The court found that eyewitnesses and the complainant's statement prima facie established the accused's involvement, and premature discharge would defeat the trial, which can only proceed through witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts