NATARAJU R vs RAVIKUMAR — 233/2023

Case under U/s 26 and Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc Section O. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS210009742023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

25th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

244/2023

Filing Date

21-06-2023

Registration No

233/2023

Registration Date

21-06-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

Acts & Sections

U/S 26 and order VII Rule 1 of CPC Section O

Petitioner(s)

NATARAJU R

Adv. MANIRAJU B

Respondent(s)

RAVIKUMAR

SHANTHAKUMARI

R SURYA

R JAYAKUMAR

ARUN KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

26-03-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

19-02-2026

EVIDENCE

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE

03-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

25-07-2024
Deposition
19-10-2024
Deposition
10-01-2025
Orders
19-09-2025
Deposition
25-10-2025
Deposition
25-10-2025
Deposition
13-11-2025
Deposition
07-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary O.S. No. 233/2023 — In this civil suit regarding a property transaction dated 10.02.2022, the court examined witness testimony on 07.03.2026. The witness testified that the plaintiff agreed to sell property for ₹3,00,000, with ₹2,50,000 paid as advance and ₹1,00,000 as a loan for agricultural expenses. The court found contradictions in the witness's statements regarding the sale deed and the remaining balance of ₹50,000, noting inconsistencies about whether the sale agreement was actually handed over. The case is adjourned for further cross-examination and proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary O.S. No. 233/2023 — In this civil suit regarding a property transaction dated 10.02.2022, the court examined witness testimony on 07.03.2026. The witness testified that the plaintiff agreed to sell property for ₹3,00,000, with ₹2,50,000 paid as advance and ₹1,00,000 as a loan for agricultural expenses. The court found contradictions in the witness's statements regarding the sale deed and the remaining balance of ₹50,000, noting inconsistencies about whether the sale agreement was actually handed over. The case is adjourned for further cross-examination and proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case