CHIKKALAMMA vs ERAMMA Advocate - K. CHANDRASHEKAR — 241/2016
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section O. Status: OBJECTIONS. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS210008102016
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
241/2016
Filing Date
11-08-2016
Registration No
241/2016
Registration Date
12-08-2016
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHIKKALAMMA
Adv. N.RAMANATHA
MAHADEVAMMA
CHIKKAMANI
Respondent(s)
ERAMMA Advocate - K. CHANDRASHEKAR
CHIKKAMMA
Adv. K. CHANDRASHEKAR
GOVINDANAYAKA
Adv. K. CHANDRASHEKAR
DEVAMANI
Adv. K. CHANDRASHEKAR
THIMMAMMA
DODDAMMA
Hearing History
Judge: 445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE
OBJECTIONS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | OBJECTIONS | |
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 26-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application (IA No.II/2025) filed by Plaintiff No.3 seeking permission to implead Smt. Chikkamannamma as Defendant No.7 in a partition suit has been dismissed. The Civil Judge held that the application was filed belatedly—over 7 years after the original suit was filed in 2016 and after evidence had been completed—suggesting an intention to delay proceedings rather than serve justice, and therefore did not meet the requirements for adding a necessary party at that advanced stage of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application (IA No.II/2025) filed by Plaintiff No.3 seeking permission to implead Smt. Chikkamannamma as Defendant No.7 in a partition suit has been dismissed. The Civil Judge held that the application was filed belatedly—over 7 years after the original suit was filed in 2016 and after evidence had been completed—suggesting an intention to delay proceedings rather than serve justice, and therefore did not meet the requirements for adding a necessary party at that advanced stage of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts