STATE BY SARAGUR P.S. vs SWAMY @ SWAMYNAYAKA — 309/2013
Case under Others Section U/S143,147,341,504,353,332R/W149OFI.P.C.. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS210008012013
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
28-05-2013
Registration No
309/2013
Registration Date
28-05-2013
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
1095-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY SARAGUR P.S.
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
SWAMY @ SWAMYNAYAKA
SHIVANANJU
KEMPANAYAKA
KEMPANAYAKA
NAGENDRANAYAKA
RAJANAYAKA
KALANAYAKA
NAGARAJU @ NAGARAJANAYAKA
KAPINAYAKA @ CHENNANAYAKA
CHIKKANNA
THIMMANAYAKA
CHENNAPPANAYAKA
DODDANAYAKA
BASAVARAJANAYAKA
SANNANAYAKA
HARISHA
MAHADEVANAYAKA
THIMMANAYAKA
GURURAJU
BETTANAYAKA
BETTANAYAKA
MANCHANAYAKA
DASANAYAKA
RAJU @ MAIKSET RAJU
NAGANAYAKA
BETTANAYAKA
CHENNANAYAKA
HANUMANAYAKA @ KAVITHA
THIMMANAYAKA
Hearing History
Judge: 1095-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 20-11-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 25-10-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 27-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court examined witness testimony in Criminal Case No. 309/13 regarding an alleged assault incident from September 23, 2012. The witness (Dr. Mallraju, a physician) testified about injuries sustained by the victim (Chase 2), noting general wounds on the forearm, thigh, and leg. The defense challenged the medical evidence, arguing that the injuries could have resulted from a bicycle fall rather than an intentional assault, and questioned whether false testimony was provided to support the victim's case. No further cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court examined witness testimony in Criminal Case No. 309/13 regarding an alleged assault incident from September 23, 2012. The witness (Dr. Mallraju, a physician) testified about injuries sustained by the victim (Chase 2), noting general wounds on the forearm, thigh, and leg. The defense challenged the medical evidence, arguing that the injuries could have resulted from a bicycle fall rather than an intentional assault, and questioned whether false testimony was provided to support the victim's case. No further cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts