MAMATHAKUMARI.B.V. vs MAYAMMA — 192/2017

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section O. Status: NOTICE. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS210006132017

NOTICE

Next Hearing

21st April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

184/2017

Filing Date

27-04-2017

Registration No

192/2017

Registration Date

28-04-2017

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

1095-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

Acts & Sections

order 7 rule 1 of CPC Section O

Petitioner(s)

MAMATHAKUMARI.B.V.

Adv. JAVARAIAH

RAVEESHGOWDA.G.N. (MINOR)

DHANUSHREE.G.N.(MINOR)

DIVYASHREE.G.N.(MINOR)

Respondent(s)

MAYAMMA

YASHODAMMA

G.N.NINGEGOWDA

G.N.MAHADEVEGOWDA

MANJULA

G.N.MADEGOWDA

REKHA

MONISA RAJAN

PRAMOD RANJAN

B.K.ACCHAPPA

ARKESH KUMAR.H.K

LAKSHMI

Hearing History

Judge: 1095-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

07-03-2026

NOTICE

17-02-2026

SUMMONS

28-11-2025

SUMMONS

09-10-2025

NOTICE

30-07-2025

NOTICE

Interim Orders

16-12-2017
Orders
24-02-2018
Orders

Summary Case: O.S.No. 192/2017 (Original Suit) Court: High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Date: 24 September 2018 Outcome: The court dismissed the petition/suit and granted relief on specific issues. The court issued detailed directions regarding the interpretation of disputed clauses in a deed (Defendant No. 1), determining rights and obligations of the parties under clauses 39(1-2) and Section 151 of the Indian Penal Code. The court clarified the scope of the deed's provisions and directed the parties regarding evidence and further proceedings in accordance with the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case: O.S.No. 192/2017 (Original Suit) Court: High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Date: 24 September 2018 Outcome: The court dismissed the petition/suit and granted relief on specific issues. The court issued detailed directions regarding the interpretation of disputed clauses in a deed (Defendant No. 1), determining rights and obligations of the parties under clauses 39(1-2) and Section 151 of the Indian Penal Code. The court clarified the scope of the deed's provisions and directed the parties regarding evidence and further proceedings in accordance with the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case